Legal Opinion

Morgan Adhesives Co. v. Sonicor Instrument Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1995No. 17222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Sonicor Instrument Corporation (“Sonicor”), appeals the Summit County Court of Common Pleas’ order denying its motion to vacate judgment, or in the alternative, motion for relief from judgment. We affirm.

I

On July 11, 1989, plaintiff-appellee, Morgan Adhesives Company (“Morgan”), purchased an ultrasonic cleaning system, which it received on September 11, 1989. While the cleaning system was manufactured by Sonicor, a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Copiague, New York, it was actually sold to Morgan through distributor Max…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MJM Holdings Inc. v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Magnum Asset Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Green Energy Technologies, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Northland Insurance v. Poulos, 06 Ma 160 (12-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ellison v. K 2 Motors, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Gaurdian Alarm Co. v. MahmoudOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API