Lawrysh v. United Van Lines
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
AVELLINO, J.,
Defendants have filed a notice of appeal, claiming the right to have my discovery order reviewed by the Superior Court. The order appealed from imposes sanctions of a preclusive nature, and is designed to punish defendants for their discovery misconduct.1 I’m hoping, of course, that “gagging” defendants will enhance plaintiff’s chances of prevailing when (and if) her claim is called for trial. This aside, my order does not end this litigation in our court and, hence, it is hopelessly unappealable as a matter of right.2
*272I certify that the statements I’ve made are accurate, and that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.