People v. Feno
California Court of Appeal
1DissentStaniforth, J.
I respectfully dissent.
We are mandated by the California Constitution, article VI, section 13, not to set aside a judgment “on the ground of misdirection of the jury . . . or for any error as to any matter of procedure, unless, after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence [we are] of the opinion that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” Reversing the jury verdict here violates this most fundamental of appellate court rules.
The key issue of fact in this case was whether Feno sold securities in violation of the Corporate Securities Law (Corp.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.