Legal Opinion

In Re Lefebvre

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 20, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Appellee, Merchants Express (Merchants), pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 1552, applied to the Maine Public Utilities Commission requesting an amendment to its permit which would extend its service from Biddeford to the Sanford-Springvale area, including the right to serve the intermediate towns from Route 111. 1 Appellee’s existing certificate allows it to operate as a common carrier between Portland-South Portland and Biddeford, including the vari-out intermediate points. 2

Congdon Transportation and Sanborn’s Motor Express, Inc., (Sanborn) both were allowed to intervene. 3 The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dubois v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  2. Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. In re StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  4. Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Lawrence v. State Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. In Re PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Standish Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API