Legal Opinion

Koerber v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1922No. Civ. No. 3979PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court sitting in probate from adjudicating title to personal property. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain and prohibit department nine of the 'superior court of the state of California, in and for the city and county of San Francisco, and the judge thereof, from rendering any decision or entering any judgment adjudicating the title to certain personal property which it is claimed belongs to the estate of May Ferguson, deceased.

The admitted facts are that May Ferguson, a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, died therein on July 23, 1920, leaving an estate. The heirs at law surviving her are her husband,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Estate of SchechtmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McCarthy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Estate of EscolleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Estate of ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API