Legal Opinion

Austin v. Kuehn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1903No. Gen. No. 11,019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Claim against deceased’s estate for legacy claimed to have been orally promised. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbkidge Hanegy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error filed in the Probate Court of Cook County, the following claim :

“ Estate of James E. Baker, deceased,

to

Catherine M. Austin, Dr.

To amount which said James E. Baker, in his lifetime, agreed to bequeath to said Catherine M. Austin, in his last will and testament, in accordance with the agreement hereinafter set forth..............................§7,500.00

CREDIT.

By cash paid on account of the same in

said Baker’s lifetime,................ §200.00

By cash paid on account of the same in ‘said Baker’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Andrews & Bros. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Chase v. FitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. White v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Flenner v. FlennerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aiken ex rel. Westgate v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API