Chase v. Fitz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This action has been argued as if it were an action of contract for breach in the performance of a marriage contract between the plaintiff and Gardner Chilson, the defendant’s testator; and it has been presented to the court as if the only question to be argued was whether, as mere matter of law, an action for a breach of promise to marry survives against the *360executor or administrator of a deceased party, who failed to perform a promise of marriage made in his lifetime.
It is true that what may perhaps be designated as the first count in the declaration states facts which inter vivos might be…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Boone v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Worcester County National Bank v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Tuttle v. ShortWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.