Kelley ex rel. Michigan Department of Natural Resources v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Michigan) petitions for review of a license the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued to the Indiana Michigan Power Company (the Company) to operate the Constantine Project, a 94-year-old hydroelectric-generating facility located on the St. Joseph River in Constantine, Michigan. Michigan challenges FERC’s refusal to require license conditions that Michigan sought. Petitioner has waived its objection to FERC’s declination to impose certain conditions — by not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Office of Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Consumer Advocate for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Citizen/labor Energy Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Washington Gas Light Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Pennsylvania Department of Commerce, Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, American Iron and Steel Institute, Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel, Washington Gas Light Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Union Light, Heat & Power Company, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Town of Norwood, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Alabama Power Company v. Federal Power Commission, United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Rivers Pacific Rivers Council Oregon Natural Resources Council Waterwatch of Oregon and Friends of the Earth, United States Department of Interior, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Respondent-Intervenor. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- New England Power Generators Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatiory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ameren Servs. Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Save Our Sebasticook v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.