Legal Opinion

4 Employee Benefits Ca 2297, 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 395 William B. Ursic v. Bethlehem Mines, a Subsidiary of Bethlehem Steel Corporation the Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Subsidiary Companies and D.W. Kempken, Plan Administrator

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 1983No. 83-5155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

719 F.2d 670

4 Employee Benefits Ca 2297, 14 Fed. R. Evid.

Serv. 395

William B. URSIC, Appellee,

v.

BETHLEHEM MINES, a subsidiary of Bethlehem Steel

Corporation; the Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel

Corporation and Subsidiary Companies;

and D.W. Kempken, Plan

Administrator, Appellants.

Nos. 83-5155, 83-5242.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit

Rule 12(6) on Aug. 12, 1983.

Decided Oct. 19, 1983.

Carl H. Hellerstedt, Jr., Joseph Mack, III, Richard R. Riese, Brian J. Dougherty, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

Stanford A. Segal, Gatz, Cohen,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rose v. Intelogic Trace, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1987
  2. Jordan v. CCH, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Snow Shoe Refractories LLC v. JumperDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API