Legal Opinion

Knudson v. Knudson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

March 1, 1926, while the plaintiff and defendant were living together as husband and wife, they deemed it advisable to adjust their property rights. Under these circumstances they subscribed their signatures to the following instrument:

“This agreement made and entered into this the first day of March, 1926, by and between Theodore Knudson and Ida M. Knudson,

WITNESSETH; That whereas said parties are husband and wife and having encountered such difficulties in their married life that they find it neces sary to separate and desire to make a settlement of all property rights between them,

Now,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fishburn v. LondershausenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Coley v. ColeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  3. In re Daly's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Head v. CroneIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ebbert v. First Nat. Bank of CondonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Smith v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API