Legal Opinion

Ebbert v. First Nat. Bank of Condon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ROSSMAN, J.

The plaintiff, a mortgagor, seeks, in this action, to recover damages from the defendant, mortgagee, for its alleged failure to enter satisfaction upon the public records of two chattel mortgages which he alleges he paid. March 16, 1921, when the plaintiff was the owner of a wheat ranch in Gilliam county, and of the personal property thereon, he executed and delivered to the defendant his promissory note for the sum of $4,800; June 2,1921, he prepared and delivered to the defendant his note in the sum of $4,906.30; Sep-, tember 13, 1921, a similar transaction took place in regard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Brown v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Malarkey v. O'LearyOregon Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. IseliOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API