Legal Opinion

Hyde v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1956No. 176-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLakamore, Judge

The plaintiff, now receiving retirement pay as a Reserve officer under title III, Act of June 29, 1948, 62 Stat. 1081, 1087, as amended, 68 Stat. 693, asks to be adjudged entitled to additional service credit in the computation thereof and also certain retroactive retirement pay.

Two questions are presented in this case: (1) Is service as a IT. S. property and disbursing officer “active Federal service” within the meaning of title III of the Act of June 29, 1948, supra; (2) is an officer who oh June 29, 1948, was fully qualified by age and service to receive retirement pay as provided by title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Price v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Seagrave v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  3. SeabrookeUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API