Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 8, 1990No. 19-83CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Dow Chemical Company sues under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281 (1982), alleging that the United States infringed its patent number 3,817,039 (the ’039 patent or the Stewart patent). Plaintiff also seeks to enforce a licensing agreement with the *625United States Bureau of Mines, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior. Jurisdiction over the infringement issue is lodged in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1982), and jurisdiction over the licensing agreement claim lies under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1982). The court limited trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Immunex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API