Legal Opinion

Central Financial Services, Inc. v. Spears

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1983No. 53677PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question in this case is whether a mortgagee, who purchases the mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale must account to the mortgagor for the surplus arising from a sale of the property by the mortgagee within two weeks for two and one-half times the amount bid by the mortgagee at the foreclosure sale.

Marshall Spears borrowed $1250 from Central Financial Services, Inc. (CFS), and executed a promissory note and financial disclosure statement along with his wife, Ester Spears. They also executed a deed of trust covering certain real property described therein to secure the debt. The total…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. Bailey Avenue Park, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hardin v. Grenada BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Weyburn v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Triplett v. BridgeforthMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Federal Credit Co. v. BolewareMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Allied Steel Corp. v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L & T DEVELOPERSMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Haygood v. First Nat. Bank of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wansley v. First Nat. Bank of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lake Hillsdale Estates, Inc. v. GallowayMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API