Legal Opinion

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Reid

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2004No. 2004-0512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On July 12, 2000, a client retained the law firm of Harshman, Gervellis and Bernard, n.k.a. Harshman, Bernard and Ramage, to represent him for injuries he sustained when a car turned in front of him and another person while they were riding motorcycles. The firm assigned the case to respondent, Wayne P. Reid of Youngstown, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0066124.

{¶ 2} On August 1, 2000, the other motorcyclist also retained the Harshman law firm for injuries sustained in the accident. The firm assigned the second client’s case to respondent as a “companion” to the first client’s case.

{¶…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. TolliverOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WickOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Cannata and Phillips (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Toledo Bar Association v. Rehkopf.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API