Legal Opinion
McPeek v. Dayton Forging and Heat Treating Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 26, 1983No. C-3-83-084PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AMEND SUSTAINED; FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF COUNSEL
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed suit in this case on February 9, 1983, under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against Defendants Dayton Forge and Heat Treating Company, the United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, and its Local No. 785. The union Defendants have moved (Doc. #7) to dismiss, or for summary judgment, and the Defendant company has moved (Doc. # 17)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federation of Westinghouse Independent Salaried Unions v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Andres Flores v. The Levy Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Former Frigidaire Employees Ass'n v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Local 801District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Dowty v. Pioneer Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Quick Air Freight, Inc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 413District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.