Williams v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The question on this appeal is whether the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania erred in finding that the defendants, Babcock & Wilcox Company and Republic Steel Corporation, had not wrongfully breached their agreement with the plaintiffs, Edward R. Williams and Julia Lee Cox Williams doing business as Williams Engineering Company,1 and that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the equitable relief they sought. The undisputed facts are these:
The plaintiff Edward R. Williams, an inventor, had done considerable research and experimental work in continuous…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hudspeth v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Neenan v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Powell v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Eastern Express, Inc. v. Mack Warehouse Corporation and Eavenson & Levering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil And Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Byce v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.