Legal Opinion

State v. Poole

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1997No. 02S01-9607-CC-00064PublishedCited by 330 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether the trial court properly applied two enhancement factors — whether the victim was “particularly vulnerable,”1 and whether the victim was treated with “exceptional cruelty” 2 — to increase the defendant’s sentence.

The Court of Criminal Appeals decided that the trial court did not err by applying the “exceptionally cruel” factor to the especially aggravated robbery conviction, but did err in applying the “particularly vulnerable” factor because the State must prove more than the victim’s age to prove a victim is “particularly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ButlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. State v. AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. KissingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by330 opinions

  1. State v. ImfeldTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ArnettTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. SamuelsTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. WinfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API