Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented on appeal is whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) erred by finding that the Pittston Area School District (District) did not depart from the status quo where the parties agreed to continue working under an extension of their old collective bargaining agreement while negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement continued.

Michael Hopkins and Arthur Clark (Claimants) are token unemployment compensation claimants who represent the members of the Pittston Area Federation of Teachers (Union). Claimants appeal the Board’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. WrightCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Fairview School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. AVCO Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API