Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1930No. 4 Div. 502PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is for damages to - plaintiff’s truck and load of hay, resulting from a collision with a locomotive of defendant at a .road' crossing.

Evidence tended to show that the truck “stalled” as it was passing over the railroad crossing, and came to a stop on the crossing.

For some minutes efforts were directed to clearing the crossing, but before this was accomplished a locomotive of defendant drawing a train of cars ran upon and demolished the truek.

Whether this was a public road crossing was an issue submitted to the jury upon evidence of public use for the prescriptive period. No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railroad v. DeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Rothrock v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. FaustAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SmelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API