Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Faust

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1919No. 7 Div. 550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; S. L. Brewer, Judge. Action by W. B. Faust against the Central of Qeorgia Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The court, at the request of the defendant, gave the affirmative charge in its favor as to count 7 and also instructed the jury, in writing, that if they believed the evidence in the case they could not find the defendant guilty of wantonness. These charges eliminate from further consideration the issues as presented by counts 6, 7 and 10; and, if the demurrers to these counts were improperly overruled, the ruling of the court was without injury to the defendant. This left in the case the simple negligence counts. The sufficiency of counts 1 and 4 are not questioned by any of the assignments…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. KirschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowdell v. BeasleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Mobile Light R. Co. v. HaroldAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Hurt v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API