State v. Ninestein.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INdictmeNt against A. II. Ninestein, heard by Judge Walter II. Neal and a jury, at February Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Rowan County. From a judgment of guilty on a special verdict, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This action was tried upon appeal from the decision of the mayor of the city of Salisbury upon a warrant charging the defendant with “engaging in the business of an itinerant merchant and peddler, without first having paid the license tax as required by law, in violation of the charter of said city.
The jury, after being empanneled to try the issue in the case, found the following special verdict:
1. That Salisbury, in the County of Rowan, is a city duly incorporated by the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina.
2. That the charter of the said city of Salisbury, Section 54,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. . GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BristowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- C. D. Kenny Co. v. Town of BrevardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Range Co. v. . CampenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Plymouth v. Cooper.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Plymouth v. Cooper.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.