Legal Opinion

State v. Bristow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Plymouth District Court.— How. F. R. Gay-nor, Judge! Appeal from a judgment of conviction for peddling without a license.—

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, J.—

The statute under which the conviction was had reads as follows:

Section 1. Peddlers plying their vocation in any county in this State outside of a city or incorporated town, shall pay an annual county tax of not less than five dollars ($5) or more than one hundred dollars ($100), as the board of supervisors of any county may provide. for that county. Such tax shall be paid to the county treasurer, who shall issue to the person making such payment duplicate receipts therefor and upon presentation of one of same to the county auditor he shall issue to the person presenting such…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dolese v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Village of Stamford v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. Bossmiller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lee Enterprises, Inc v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. State v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Kendrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API