Legal Opinion

Pelc v. City of Danbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 14, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiffs brought this action for a declaratory judgment and for injunctive relief, challenging thereby the legality of a tax formula contained in article V, § 4, of the charter of the city of Danbury. The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint and the defendants admitted in their answers that under the provisions of the charter the city is divided into three taxing districts. All property in the city is included in the basic tax district. Properties connected to either city water or city sewer facilities are included in urban tax district No. 1 and in addition to liability for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Atwater v. Morning News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  4. Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. FurlongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Hao Thi Popp v. LucasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. GrisgraberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API