Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2003No. 01-566PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Kent D. Neal (Neal) appeals from the order of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County, in favor of Respondent State of Montana, denying Neal an award of costs following his successful challenge to the suspension of his driver’s license. We reverse and remand.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it denied Neal’s request for costs.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 On January 18, 2001, after being arrested for Driving Under the Influence (DUI), Neal’s driver’s license was suspended for refusing to take a breath test. On February 2,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Palmer v. HartMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matter of KlosMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jones v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Armstrong v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KrollMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Peña v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rolison v. Bozeman Deaconess Health Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Pena v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Total Industrial Plant Services, Inc. v. Turner Industries Group, LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API