Wolfe v. Titus
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of -San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The court below sustained the demurrers of the defendants without leave to1 amend the complaint, and thereupon entered judgment dismissing the action, with costs to the defendants. From this judgment the appeal is taken. *265Appellant’s counsel states the object of the action as follows: “This action was commenced for the cancellation of an alleged promissory note in the principal sum of six thousand dollars, and mortgages to secure the same upon certain real estate described in the complaint, and for an injunction against an action pending for the foreclosure of the note and mortgage at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Erie Railway Company v. . RamseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Graham v. Boston, Hartford & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Buena Vista Fruit & Vineyard Co. v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Crowley v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Waymire v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Johnson v. Sun Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gray v. South & North Alabama Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Wilbur v. GriffinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Taliaferro v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955