Legal Opinion

Skaggs Regional Medical Center v. Powers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2014No. SD 32741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

Could a creditor, having partially assigned a claim to a third party for collection per RSMo § 425.300, still sue and recover on the claim? We find, here, that it could.

The Statute

Text unchanged since at least 1992, § 425.300 reads as follows:

Collection agencies may take assignment of claims in their own name as real parties in interest for the purpose of billing and collection and bringing suit in their own and the claimant’s names thereon, provided that no suit authorized by this section may be instituted on behalf of a collection agency in any court unless the collection agency appears by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rohner, Gehrig & Company v. Capital City BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Manzara v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. C & M DEVELOPERS, INC. v. Berbiglia, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Holt v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. McMullin v. BorgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greg Hageman v. Dennis Barton, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. FOUR STAR ENTERPRISES EQUIPMENT, INC., and RGH, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Respondents v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-AppellantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API