Legal Opinion

Centorino v. Tewksbury Twp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 27, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

789 A.2d 655 (2002)

347 N.J. Super. 256

Marianne CENTORINO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Respondent.

Tewksbury Township, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Marianne Centorino, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 26, 2001.

Decided December 27, 2001.

Steven R. Irwin, West Orange, argued the cause for Marianne Centorino (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Mr. Irwin, on the brief).

Judith A. Kopen, Clinton, argued the cause for Tewksbury Township (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Arthur D. Fialk, Bridgewater, on the brief).

Before Judges…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Township of West Milford v. Van DeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Formosa v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of USNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. REGENT CARE v. Hackensack CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Hackensack City v. Bergen CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Shippee v. Brick TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
  4. Brunetti v. Cherry Hill TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API