Legal Opinion
Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of Taxation
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided May 10, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MENYUK, J.T.C.
This matter comes before the court on a motion by defendants Director, Division of Taxation (the “Director” and the “Division”) and the Camden County Board of Taxation (collectively, the “State defendants”) to dismiss the complaints in these matters for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for mootness. Lindenwold Borough joins in the motion of the State defendants.
The complaints challenge the validity of L. 2001, c. 101 (“Chapter 101”) on its face and as applied on various constitutional grounds. In general terms, Chapter 101 provides that an assessor…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Township of West Milford v. Van DeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- In Re HagueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Presbyterian Home at Pennington, Inc. v. Borough of PenningtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Township of Jefferson v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
- GGI Props., LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Props., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2008
- RONALD BENTZ VS. TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE EGG HARBOR (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019