Legal Opinion
Brunetti v. Cherry Hill Township
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 21, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In this appeal, property owner John J. Brunetti claims error in a determination by Judge Joseph C. Small, following a testimonial hearing, that the reassessment of his property for tax purposes did not constitute an unconstitutional spot assessment. The reassessment at issue occurred in 1999, after a contract for sale of the property had been executed but before sale had taken place. It raised the assessed value of the property from $1,540,000 to $4,203,000, an amount that was roughly equivalent to the contract sales price.
In reaching his decision, Judge Small found ample evidence in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- GLENPOINTE ASS'N. v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Township of West Milford v. Van DeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Frieman v. Randolph Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007
- Mountain View Crossing Investors LLC v. Township of WayneNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
- Freehold Borough v. WNY Properties L.P.New Jersey Tax Court · 2003
- Orban v. Alexandria TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
- Schumar v. Bernardsville BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004