Legal Opinion

Excelsior Needle Co. v. Union Needle Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 23, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

Hopson and Brooks were the inventors of a machine for coinpressing articles of metal in dies, and letters patent therefor were granted to them August 9, 1864, and reissued December 12, 1865. The specification, among other things, states:

“Our invention has for its object the compressing of metal to a smooth, round form, corresponding to the shape of the dies, and consists in a divided die, that is forced together two or more times during each revolution around the article to be formed, and, by a series of compressions upon the sides of such article, reduces the same to the size and shape of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Wooster v. CalhounU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edison v. American Mutoscope Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  2. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  3. Blakesley Novelty Co. v. Connecticut Web Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Blumenthal v. BurrellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1890
  5. Chicago Film Exchange v. Motion Picture Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API