Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Sheahan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 22, 2004No. 04 C 1051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Quentin Bullock (also known as Robert Bullock) and Jack Reid allege that defendants Michael Sheahan, Cook County Sheriff, and Cook County have a policy and/or practice under which Mr. Bullock and Mr. Reid were subjected to strip-searches upon returning to the Cook County Department of Corrections (CCDC) for out-processing. On July 17, 2002, Mr. Bullock was arrested for armed robbery and committed to the custody of the CCDC. Following a bench trial on December 17, 2003, Mr. Bullock was found not guilty and was returned to the CCDC…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Clarence C. Trotter v. Paul J. Klincar, Individually and as Acting Chairman of the Prison Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Patrykus v. GomillaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Harris v. General Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Krislov v. RednourDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Streeter v. Sheriff of Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. Otero v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API