Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Five Guys From Boston, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

In this action of tort for negligence the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, a minor, against the defendant whose alleged employee gave the plaintiff a pressurized can of whipped cream which later exploded in the plaintiff's face in circumstances to be stated. The case is before us on the defendant's exceptions to the denial of its motions for a directed verdict and for the entry of a verdict under leave reserved.

To test the validity of the defendant’s exceptions we summarize and view the evidence in light most favorable to the plaintiff. Howes v. Kelman, 326 Mass. 696. Carr v. Arthur…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Carr v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. West v. Molders Foundry Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. McLaughlin v. BernsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  3. Panesis v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  4. Lawrence v. Kamco, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Smith v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API