Legal Opinion

Tindell v. Guy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1942No. 4 Div. 254PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit by the administratrix was for death of intestate caused by collision with defendant’s automobile.

Amended plea four for contributory negligence was subject to the demurrer and was no answer to count two declaring for the willful and wanton conduct of defendant. This ruling was corrected by the trial court in the general charge and in written charge number two, given at the defendant’s request, limiting that plea to the count declaring for simple negligence, and excluding it as an answer to the second.count declaring for a willful and wanton injury. Jones v. Alabama…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Prater v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. McClellan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thetford v. City of ClantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Fox v. BartholfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Gunnells v. DethrageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API