Legal Opinion

Gunnells v. Dethrage

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 26, 1979No. 77-260, 77-261PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These appeals present a question of first impression: Is a minor held to an adult standard in determining whether his conduct while operating a motor vehicle is wilful or wanton? We hold he is.

Appellee, David Dethrage, a minor, filed his action against appellant, Steven Gunnells, also a minor, to recover damages for personal injuries received while a passenger in an automobile driven by Gunnells. Dethrage had accompanied Gunnells on a late night trip from Birmingham to Anniston. During the trip Gunnells fell asleep at the wheel, and the automobile left the road and struck a bridge abutment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  2. Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lankford v. IwongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Wittmeier v. PostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Whaley v. LawingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Keller v. KiedingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. ROE BY AND THROUGH ROE v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Bishop v. PooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Tapscott v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API