Legal Opinion
Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 26, 1999No. Civil 99-112-P-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. d/b/a Grimmel Industries filed a six-count First Amended Complaint seeking: a declaration of ownership rights of a railroad spur (Count 1); an injunction preventing destruction of the spur and interference with Grimmel’s right to repair, maintain, and use the spur (Count II); unlawful refusal to provide rail service, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11101 (Count III); breach of duty to Grimmel as third-party beneficiary of the freight easement agreement between MEC and the State of Maine (Count…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Flynn v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.(BNSF)District Court, E.D. Washington · 2000
- Deep v. BoiesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. 16.66 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999