Legal Opinion
McIntee v. Baker
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1936No. File No. 6425PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
This action to recover damages resulting from a collision between a car owned by defendant Baker and a car owned by the plain tiff was tried against Baker only. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made and denied and Baker appeals.
There are thirty-three specifications of error, some with several subdivisions; but we are satisfied the undisputed facts determine the issue.
Defendant Baker was the sole owner of two businesses in Minot— one dealing largely with the sale of leather, conducted under the name of A. Baker & Co.; the other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Perry v. A. Paladini, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Wagnitz v. ScharetgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Hoffer v. BurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Feather v. KrauseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Employers Mut. Cas. Co. Of Des Moines, Iowa v. Federated Mut. Implement & Hardware Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Matt v. NomlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.