Legal Opinion

Chessman v. Teets

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 17, 1955No. 196PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner applied to the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division, for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his automatic appeal to the California Supreme Court from a conviction for a capital offense had been heard upon a fraudulently prepared transcript of the trial proceedings. The official court reporter had died before completing the transcription of his stenographic notes of the trial, and petitioner alleges that the prosecuting attorney and the substitute reporter selected by him had, by corrupt arrangement, prepared the fraudulent transcript.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. In Re ChessmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Herman v. ClaudySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Leroy Edward Green v. Camilla Maraio and Angelo J. IngrassiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API