Legal Opinion
Russell Musnick v. King Motor Company of Fort Lauderdale, d.b.a., King Auto Mall
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 28, 2003No. 02-12648PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
King Motor Company of Fort Lauder-dale appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration.
I
Russell Musnick signed an agreement to arbitrate any discrimination claim he might bring against his employer, King Motor Company of Fort Lauderdale (“King”). The Arbitration Agreement (the “Agreement”) provides, in part:
The prevailing party shall be awarded costs including reasonable attorneys’ fees, filing fee, subpoena service and witness fee, deposition and hearing transcription costs and similar expenses, but not including expert fees unless the expert…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases Thomas Barford Jerry StumpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Blaise Alexander Gerald Freeman v. Anthony International, L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- in Re Olshan Foundation Repair Company, LLC and Olshan Foundation Repair Company of Dallas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
- Terminix International Co. LP v. Palmer Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Leonard J. Klay v. AllCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.