Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1913No. 9739PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered January 14, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action by a passenger for injuries sustained in a collision.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Mount, J.

A rehearing was granted in this case, and it has been reargued to all the judges sitting en banc. A fair statement of the facts was made in the original opinion, which may be found in 67 Wash. 96, 120 Pac. 889. The facts need not be restated here.

Upon this rehearing, we have concluded that a new trial must be granted for the errors hereinafter noticed. As stated in the former majority opinion, “appellant did not dispute its negligence; nor did it deny its liability for any injuries which may have resulted to respondent” on account of the collision of the appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Taylor v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cochran v. GritmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Greenberg v. StanleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Johnston-Forbes v. MatsunagaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Cathy Johnston-forbes v. Dawn MatsunagaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API