Legal Opinion

Cathy Johnston-forbes v. Dawn Matsunaga

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 29, 2013No. 43078-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED COURT DP APPEALS DIVISIIOP II 2013 OCT 29 Aar 9: lab IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHI DIVISION II CATHY JOHNSTON- FORBES, No. 43078 -9 -II Appellant, V. DAWN MATSUNAGA, PUBLISHED OPINION HUNT, J. — Cathy Johnston- Forbes appeals the jury' s special verdict' finding that Dawn Matsunaga' s negligence had not proximately caused Johnston- Forbes' injuries in a car accident. Johnston -Forbes argues that the trial court committed reversible error in denying her motion in limine to exclude defense expert Allan Tencer' s testimony about the forces involved in this accident. Holding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API