Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Lee Mishkin

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1962No. L. A. No. 26196PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In his will the testator divided his estate into Fund A consisting of “cash, securities and money in the bank” and Fund B consisting of “a parcel of real estate situated in Los Angeles, California, and improved with two (2) single family residences, together with furniture, fixtures, personal belongings and library contained therein.” He directed that the assets comprising Fund B be sold and the cash distributed to three named trustees in trust. “The income of said trust, or so much of the principal as in the sole discretion of the Trustees may be deemed desirable or advisable, is to be used…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of ThomasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Estate of RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. United California Bank v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Estate of McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Estate of AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API