Legal Opinion
United California Bank v. Mosk
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1964No. Civ. No. 27921PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
Robert O. McKenzie died testate leaving a holographic will. The only portion of said will in dispute herein declares:
“I want a trust to be formed payable as a reward to the person who decides the cause of Rhomatoid [sic] Arthritis and a cure for the same to the satisfaction of the Medical Board of the University of Calif, at L.A.”
United California Bank, as executor of the above entitled estate, filed a petition for a decree determining interests in estate under section 1080 of the Probate Code and for instructions to executor under section 588 of the Probate Code. In response thereto a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Estate of UphamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kline v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of ThomasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Estate of LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Estate of McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- In Re BookerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Paulsen v. San Francisco Foundation of OtologyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.