Legal Opinion

(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01042Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY CHARLES EILAND, No. 2:18-cv-1042 MCE KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On August 7, 2020, defendants Tam and Walden were granted summary judgment and 19 dismissed from this action. No other defendant has been served or appeared in this action. By 20 order filed October 16, 2018, plaintiff’s amended complaint was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tyrone Merritt v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Cabrales v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Roger Brass v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Rick Thurlo, Individually and as a Peace OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Juan PardoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API