Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Pardo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 25, 1994No. 93-5104PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
Appellant Juan Pardo challenges on four grounds his sentence imposed after a guilty plea to single counts of bank and wire fraud and a count of failure to appear. Two grounds are set forth in his counselled brief, and two others appear in a supplemental pro se filing. Although we reject most of Pardo’s arguments, we agree that the district court misapplied United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.3 when it determined that Pardo’s friendship with a bank manager constituted a position of trust that facilitated his defrauding the bank. See United States…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Arthur Howard Hill, AKA Sonny HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Arthur LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Basil G. GeorgiadisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Craig B. SokolowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Sean Hart, Neil White, Joseph Orlando, Lawrence WeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John Michael IannoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.