Legal Opinion

Midland Glass Company, Inc. v. City of Shakopee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1975No. 44687PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Defendant Northern States Power Company (NSP) appeals from a summary judgment entered July 24, 1973, declaring the utility franchise granted to NSP by the city of Shakopee void. The trial court determined that a 7-percent surcharge to be collected by NSP from certain customers was unconstitutional. This holding is not challenged on this appeal. However, the trial court further found the surcharge provision to be so woven into the franchise grant as to require the entire franchise to be declared void, despite the existence of a severability clause in both ordinances involved. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TraczykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Alexander v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. American Family Insurance v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API