Legal Opinion
Arute Bros. v. Department of Transportation
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 2005No. AC 25002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The question presented in this appeal is whether an arbitration conducted pursuant to General Statutes § 4-61 is an action to which General Statutes § 52-592, the accidental failure of suit statute, applies. We conclude that a § 4-61 arbitration proceeding is not an action under § 52-592 and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as alleged in the complaint, are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On November 30,1989, the plaintiff, Arute Brothers, Inc., entered into a contract with the defendant, the department of transportation, to construct…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Carbone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chayoon v. SherlockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Benson v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF WESTPORTConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Arute Bros. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022