Legal Opinion
Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 15, 2021No. SC20535PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PHYLLIS LARMEL v. METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD COMPANY (SC 20535) Robinson, C. J., and D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the accidental failure of suit statute (§ 52-592 (a)), ‘‘[i]f any action, commenced within the time limited by law, has failed one or more times to be tried on its merits because . . . the action has been otherwise avoided or defeated . . . for any matter of form . . . the plaintiff . . . may commence a new action . . . for the same cause at any time within one year after the determination of the original action . . . .’’ Pursuant further…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Veronice A. Holt v. Kmi-Continental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Khan v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023