Minnesota Commercial Railway Co. v. General Star Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Under Minnesota law, an insured person may not use estoppel to create insurance coverage unless the insurer unqualifiedly controlled the defense of an action against the insured. Between February 1, 2000 and February 1, 2001, Minnesota Commercial Railway Company (“the Railway”) held an insurance policy with General Star Indemnity Company (“General Star”) that covered claims made during the policy period. On July 23, 2001 — five months after the policy expired — the Railway submitted a claim to General Star stemming from an injury to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Robert Mems Nathanial Khaliq James Logan Phillip Webb Thurman Smith Byron Brown v. City of St. Paul, Department of Fire and Safety ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. GerrardDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022