Bennett v. Rosborough
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
It is declared in the Civil Code, § 2498: “The assured may direct the money to be paid to his personal representative, or to his widow, or to his children, or to his assignee; and upon such direction given, and assented to by the insurer, no other person can defeat the same. But the assignment is good without such assent.” The principle of this section was applied in Smith v. Head, 75 Ga. 755. That was a case *271where a husband obtained a policy of life-insurance which was payable to his wife. It was held that the policy was the property of the wife, and could not be subjected by creditors of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Babcock Bros. Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Smith v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Fraser v. Smith & Kelly Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Garabrant v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Succession of OnoratoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Mullikin v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Aetna Life Insurance v. WeekesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.